Yes, I admit it, I was wrong in my May 23, 2011, blog post
regarding personal privacy and the threats to personal privacy. I was wrong because I so incredibly
underestimated what the government of the United States, and specifically the
National Security Administration (NSA), was and is doing to compromise the security
and privacy of…of…well EVERYTHING !
The NSA has adopted a policy that everyone is suspect, until
proven otherwise, and then, in all probability, that one time they prove
otherwise applies only until the next time they suspect you. They have adopted a policy of collecting everything
and then they get to figure out who was naughty and who was nice, only Santa
they ain’t. This policy has likely
created the largest dragnet of personal information of innocent people the
world has ever known.
Thanks to the revelations of Edward Snowden, we now know
that the NSA has been collecting pretty much every communication between every
United States citizen and anyone else on the planet inside or outside the
United States. This includes email,
telephone calls, radio calls (okay, that was always pretty open anyway) and the
United States Mail. We now know, in
fact, that the NSA has done its level best to compromise, by hook or crook, any
kind of communication security in which we engage in this country and probably
the world.
The NSA has worked to compromise the security of
communications using requests, begging and pleading and finally, conniving, threats,
coercion and force. Every company and designer
of security software has been asked to put a weakness in their encryption
software or install a “back-door” that allows the NSA to circumvent the need
for a password to de-encrypt an otherwise coded message. Those that refused found themselves “under
investigation” and their top-level executives threaten with prosecution and
jail if they failed to comply. Many
companies just got “hacked” and the back-doors installed without their
knowledge.
As more and more information becomes known, we find the NSA
reeling. Why? Because they never thought they would ever
get caught. They never thought they
would have to explain, to a previously unsuspecting citizenry, why they need to
read our mail and listen to our phone calls.
They are having a huge hard time of it.
It seems that when they have screwed up in the past, the so-called
FISA Court, has admonished them. What
has been the result? Greater secrecy! The NSA is not about doing what the Courts tell it what it should be doing, it
is about figuring out how to make things ever more secret; make it harder to
get caught. When the NSA and the
government get caught with their hands in the information/intelligence cookie jar,
they just add a few more layers secrecy so no one can figure out how they are
violating the privacy of the people. It
is that simple.
Nothing healthy grows in the dark. The kind of growth you don’t want is what thrives
in secret. The NSA has become a mold on
freedom and all it wants is more secrecy, more darkness so it can flourish at
the expense of us all.
Edward Snowden will be forever reviled in the intelligence
community. As a result of what he has
released, and what he continues to release, We The People, have figured out
what our government is collecting on us, but this is not about Edward Snowden
as much as it is about what the government is collecting on each one of We the
People.
I do not understand why people are not standing on very tall
soapboxes, screaming at the top of their lungs, to whoever will listen, that
this is wrong. We are being raped of our
privacy and the NSA’s response to getting caught, in addition to trying to make
it harder to catch them next time, is to tell us it is necessary and for our
own good. The government is engaged in the
moral equivalent of combining “Trust Us” and “It is inevitable, just lay back
and enjoy it.”
I know the response of most of my Conservative friends, “Well,
I don’t care who knows what I am doing.
I am not doing anything wrong.
Let them look.” As I have said
before, that is fine, you are welcome to give up your Right to Privacy, but you
are not entitled to give away mine. Sit
down right now, draft a letter to the NSA and give them the authorization to
read every letter, email, text message, note and memo you write. Give them the authority listen in on every
conversation you have, tap your phones and hell, while you are at it; let them
take a peek at your medical records. Why
would you care if they know you aren’t sick or maybe you are? What difference does it make?
It is when you start to try to give away MY right to privacy that I take great
exception. Remember, some of the worst
oppressions on the planet came at the hands of a majority against a minority. Just ask African Americans (You remember,
slavery?), Native Americans (does Wounded Knee ring a bell? Reservations?
The Trail of Tears?). The world
is rife with examples of uncaring majorities allowing the rights of minorities
to be compromised or eliminated altogether.
The Jews in Nazi Germany were just such a minority and now we hear that
prolific cry, “Never Again.” Where are
those cries now, in light of the massive violation of our privacy at the hands
of the government?
Since it is a Right (note the capital R) as defined by the
Supreme Court as being guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States, I
do not have to justify why I wish to invoke that Right. It is my Right to do so, and I am not
required to explain it to anyone. Ask a Conservative to justify why he wants or
needs to keep and bear arms, they will routinely tell you, “Because it is my
Right.” Oh and one of the justifications
for why the government cannot require you to register your firearm(s) is
because you have a Right to Privacy.
By the way, all you so-called “Constitutionalists,” the word
“privacy” never once appears in the Constitution, but it comes from an
interpretation of the Fourth Amendment by the Supreme Court. Does that reviled term “judicial activism” work
for you here, or would you argue that in the United States we have no Right to
privacy and the government can act with impunity and disregard to anything
related to personal privacy? You better
watch out because without a Right to Privacy, gun registration may not be far
behind. Is there anything at all that is
just none of their business? I am afraid
the American People have a strange way of deciding what is and is not anyone’s
business for themselves, but then there is that pesky majority rules, minority Rights
argument.
This issue is becoming less and less about Edward Snowden
and more about the abuses of power and technology in which the U.S. Government is
engaged. We are finding out that the
Government views us as little children who have no idea what is in our best
interests, but as good parents, our government thinks they can tell us. This does not, in my opinion, square with
government by the people, but most
certainly fits within their definition of government of the people.
No comments:
Post a Comment